Adults spend an average of 99 more minutes at home each day compared with 2003.

Explore

The generation aged 15 to 24 spends 124 more minutes at home than their counterparts two decades ago.

From 2003 to 2023, time spent on in-person socializing plunged by more than 20%

From 1990 to 2021, there was a decrease of 25 percentage points in the number of Americans who say they have five or more close friends

We have been collectively increasing the speed of our retreat from public life. What does this mean for us?

The Geography of Isolation

and a return to public life

Listen to this article · 7:18 min Learn more

My time on stage is most likely done, unless Gen Alpha decides to bring the struggle session to American shores, but sometimes when I am working up the courage to talk to other dads at the playground while my daughter impatiently waits for their kids to get off of the good swing, I remind myself that I used to be kind of cool. People used to pay money to watch me play music and perform comedy, and the comments from critics I got were pretty positive, except for one that has stuck with me through the years.

Walter's (first on Washington Ave, then on Naylor St) was a vital waypoint in my development into adulthood. I met my core group of adult post-college friends there, I played shows there, I developed my first feelings of confidence there. Walter's was a true independent music venue, every band with enough indie cred passed through the Walter's stage. There were memories that we still talk about decades later, some moments that feel shockingly dangerous to look back on but were weirdly funny at the time like when Two Gallants got tased by the cops and a riot broke out, any of the dozens of times Roy the bartender fired a gun into the air, and sweeter moments like watching our friends in The Dimes/Young Mammals, Buxton, and Wild Moccasins share the stage with larger than life indie acts like The Walkmen and Warpaint. I got to share a few moments like that playing with Titus Andronicus and The So So Glow a few years later. The memories were core, but there was a cast of characters that made Walter's feel truly rooted as an institution.

One of these cast of characters was Terry, the sound guy. This was a man who in a very real sense made things work, Walter's sound punched above its weight. His technical skill was impressive, his patience and kindness towards a bunch of twenty-somethings with ambitions dreams of indie fame was legendary.

I had a spot on a stand-up show one night in 2012, I told an offhand joke about my embarrassment to be considered a "local." I was taken with the idea of a digital network of connections, to be rooted in one place felt antiquated to me and not where I felt like I belonged. When I stepped off stage, Terry stopped me and told me that my joke hurt: being a local was something that made him proud. Delivered with the same patience and kindness as any of the times when I fucked something up during sound check, his reaction immediately shifted my attitude about the role and utmost dignity of being a "local." Without Terry's kind aside this project wouldn't exist, nor would my foundational understanding that true community places like Walter's are a vital part of the fabric of our society, partially because they allow local figures like Terry to make themselves visible and known.

Roy Oldenburg, American sociologist, arrived at this understanding a few decades earlier. Oldenburg noted that local figures provide continuity and identity to a place. This allows them to act as informal hosts who can integrate newcomers and lower barriers to entry, making a community more welcoming to join into. This all allows them to act with a great deal of power to transmit local knowledge, stories, and norms. Through their presence and interactions, they create the unwritten rules that govern how people interact in that space, creating social cohesion and an environment that can protect its community (link to Walter's sign).

What are Third Places?

Oldenburg is most notable for coining the term Third Places. Third places are primarily thought of as informal public gathering spots that exist outside the two usual social environments of home (the "first place") and work (the "second place"). Third places are the cafes, pubs, barbershops, bookstores, parks, and other venues where people come together voluntarily for conversation and community. They are places that facilitate social connection.

Third Place Defining Features

They operate on neutral ground, meaning no one plays host and everyone feels free to come and go.

They function as levelers, where social rank and status are set aside in favor of more egalitarian interaction.

They have regulars who give the place its character and welcome newcomers, yet remain accessible and unassuming, with low barriers to entry.

And they serve as a home away from home, providing warmth and a sense of belonging without the obligations of domestic life.

Oldenburg noted back in the 1980's that participation in the spaces were already declining. In the time since the publication of The Great Good Place, his prediction has continued to prove prescient. Today, in the mid-2020s, in the time since the COVID-19 pandemic, participation has dropped even further. Personal preferences have changed dramatically with the introduction of social media and the smartphone, as socializing has for the first time shifted more and more towards screens (cite data here).

I am now a parent of a perfect 7 year old girl and I couldn't tell you the first thing about what is happening in the independent music world anymore or even if there is one, but I do know that we're gonna be gonna be golden. As I've been trying to find my way back to a community in the post-pandemic years, I'm finding it much more difficult than I did back in 2008. I'm finding it hard for myself, and especially to find places where my daughter can hang out outside of the house.

I feel it the most in the summer. From November-March, we can default to the healthy supply of local parks in our neighborhood, but the Houston sun plus playground plastic and metal are a poor match for small hands.

As with most of my decisions these days, I think about what this models for my daughter. As most of my socializing has taken place through digital means through many of her formative years, I see a hesitancy in her to forge new social relationships at school. I've watched from the side as she has taken a tentative step forward and then two back, I can't help think that something has been lost by not being able to show her how it's done done done.

Have I been missing something? Do we live in a specifically empty community? Or is this as good as it gets? To think this through, I did was what any normal parent would do, and I queried 1.5 million places tagged as location types that fit the functions of third places on OpenStreetMaps through the Overpass API, and then created a percentile-based score for each census tract to get granular information on third place access and density. I then cross-referenced it with data from the US Census Bureau on the number of children in each census tract to look at how third place access relates to families with children. Am I doing something specifically wrong, or is this a broader trend? Are we raising our kids in environments that encourage social isolation and taking their parents along with them? What happens when some kids have access to third places and others dont?

Two Neighborhoods, Two Realities

Let's compare two census tracts in Houston, Texas. Both are in the same metropolitan area. Both are home to thousands of people. But the geography of their isolation tells very different stories.

The Desert

Census Tract 48201221900

5,231 Population
32% Children under 18
3 Third places
21st TPI Percentile

This neighborhood is home to 1,669 children. But it has just 3 third places: two retail stores and one civic space. That's one gathering place for every 1,744 residents.

The Oasis

Census Tract 48201510500

4,389 Population
15% Children under 18
36 Third places
95th TPI Percentile

Just miles away, a neighborhood with fewer children has 12 times more gathering spaces: 23 cafes and restaurants, 5 personal services, 3 parks, 2 gyms, and more. One place for every 122 residents.

The Variety Matters

High Child Tract
Low Child Tract
Cafes & restaurants
0
23
Parks & public spaces
0
3
Fitness & wellness
0
2
Personal services
0
5
Civic & educational
1
2
Commercial space
2
1
Total
3
36

More Places, More Possibilities

Variety gives people choices. Not everyone wants to socialize at a coffee shop. Some prefer parks, gyms, libraries, or community centers. More options mean more chances to find places that fit your personality and interests.

This diversity creates opportunities for serendipitous encounters, for building weak ties across different social groups, for kids to see adults engaging with their community.

And crucially: it means less time in cars, driving to distant destinations. When third places are nearby and abundant, community happens on the way to somewhere else.

The places with the most kids have the fewest third places for them to go.

If you're a parent in a high-child neighborhood (the quarter of American communities with the highest percentage of children), you have on average less access to third places in your community compared to places with fewer kids. This means 66% fewer third places than the quarter of communities with the fewest children, a gap of nearly 6 locations where families can gather, socialize, and build community.

On average, high-child tracts have 5.7 fewer third places than low-child tracts

In personal terms, this means more scrambling to clean our tiny house so my daughter can have a playdate in our cramped space. This means less driving to meet our daughter's friend's family at a brewery with a playground that is 30 minutes away, listening to Brains On archive episodes that we've listened to thousands of times because they lost funding and shut down and all the other podcasts out there for kids are brain rot garbage. This means less of a feeling that we live in a community, and more of a feeling that we simply live in a very non-liquid real estate investment.

Two bar charts comparing 14.3 places vs. 8.6 places for high-child vs. low-child neighborhoods

As neighborhoods get more kids, third spaces disappear

This isn't an abstracted pattern visible only across quartiles. It is a systematic pattern that holds up at every level of children in a census tract, a perfectly strengthened Honmoon repelling children and parents against places where they can socialize.

Scatter plot showing 83,000+ communities with downward trend line from 16.5 to 6.8 places
Geography facets visualization

There are confluences of zoning and economics that go beyond the scope of this project (let me know if you want to collaborate!) but the data are clear that the places we build to raise children in are not designed to consider their social development to be connected to the built environment around them. And as isolated as my neighborhood feels, the steady decline noted in this chart makes it clear there are communities worse off than mine, with even more children, I imagine their parents are feeling unmoored as well.

For every 10 percentage point increase in child population, communities lose approximately 1-2 third places on average

Millions of kids are growing up in 'third place deserts'

Imagine raising your child in a community where there are 5 or fewer places outside of home and school where families can gather. This means maybe two restaurants, one park, a bar, and a church. That's it. Millions of children growing up without casual access to the social infrastructure that previous generations took for granted. No local shop to walk to, no library with familiar faces, no coffee shop where the barista knows your name and lets your kid have the bathroom key even if they don't buy a topo chico. Just the home, the car, and increasingly the screen.

Over 8 million children are growing up in a community like this, one of the 10,863 census tracts where over 25% of the tract population is under 18 yet there are 5 or fewer third places. This accounts for 13% of all census tracts in America.

There are far fewer tracts where there are a high level of children and a high level of third places. And the difference can't be accounted for based on socioeconomic status alone either, as I first suspected.

Comparison chart showing a desert tract vs. an oasis tract, with icons for types of places

It connects to a feeling I've had throughout my life as a parent, that children aren't quite welcomed in public life. When I started flying with my daughter there was a social media trend going around of parents preparing bags for passengers in nearby rows, with candy a conciliatory note pre-apologizing in case their young child cried or made a noise. It struck me as pathetic but with an accurate sense of self-awareness. I've received many ugly glares because my daughter deigned to make a verbal noise, for my part I chose a Churchill-like approach rather than this meek policy of appeasement.

But the experience, and the data I've studied rhymed with my childhood sensation that the world was for grownups. Children aren't welcome in the air, and they're not quite welcome on the ground either.

So, to ask the question again, are we raising our kids in environments that encourage social isolation and taking their parents along with them? Yes, yes we are.

We are social creatures, and in the vast evolutionary history of species, raising our youth in increasing social isolation should be considered a radical experiment. Certainly not one I would opt my daughter into.

What does this mean for us? Does this mean that children in a third place desert are doomed to isolation, or that children in a third place oasis have received a birthright to tons of meaningful close friendships and a rich social life? Not necessarily, but third places are meaningful gestures. These gestures can show a child that they are welcomed into the world, that new residents can become members of a community, that neighbors can be more than people looking at Nexdoor to see if those were fireworks or gun shots, and that social connections in real life still matter. Third places can color people's lives with additional types of meaning, where an experienced sound technician can be a keeper of community history, where a barista can be a point of connection to a new home.

The patterns surrounding the retreat from public life have been going on since before I was born (not much longer though, I am considerably older than the average age of this program) and they won't be solved in my lifetime (but fair reminder: i am not young). The question is whether we can start making different choices. These choices are partially personal - do we prize convenience over connection and go to the drive-thru Starbucks for our morning coffee or do we get out of the car and wait in line at the local coffee shop that set up generators for people to charge their devices when the power went out for weeks in the last hurricane? These choices are also matters of policy. Can we prioritize community social infrastructure in the same way we prioritize parking requirements? We have the tools, we have a foundation of data, we know the direction we're heading. We need to realize that the next steps are up to us. So let's all start talking about it.

But we can't meet to talk about it at our house, it's a complete mess, my daughter's toys scattered all over the place and there's Goldfish crumbs on the couch.

Next Steps

Explore your community's access to third places →
About the Third Place Index

Methodology details about how the Third Place Index was created...

Resources

Further Reading

  • Reading list items to come

Organizations

  • Organizations doing research/outreach

Take Action

  • What's next? Ways to take this info and do something with it